hlan
New Member
Posts: 41 
|
Post by hlan on May 9, 2010 5:18:16 GMT 7
Because performance is a regularly mentioned subject, here some appromximate figures from my environment (SATA HDD greeen @ 5400 rpm [except USB HDD @ 7200 rpm], Giga-bit LAN, JBod 2x HDD). The desktop used for below test is 8 years old (Intel P4 @ 2.4GHz etc). | 1GB | XP<->XP | XP<->USB HDD | XP<-N2200 | XP->N2200 | | Video | 25s | 55s | 65s | 95s | | Photos | 85s | 90s | 110s | 120s |
This is not a scientific measure (drag & drop, clock) and also heavily depends on the respective environment. Personally, for the moment I am not so much worried about this performance because I use this NAS more as location of reference (with =< 2 concurrent users) than interactive work folder. N2200 ROOTCMD free | total | used | free | shared | buffers | | Mem: | 256332 | 94488 | 161844 | 0 | 45384 | | Swap: | 2007992 | 144 | 2007848 | | |
|
|
misha
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by misha on May 9, 2010 10:49:11 GMT 7
Thanks hlan,
It would be interesting to compare the shared folders with ftp, I find it more responsive, I wonder if it is also faster overall.
|
|
oinq
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by oinq on Jan 14, 2013 4:11:24 GMT 7
 My results PC with i7 3770k, 2x ADATA P900 in Raid 0; 2x 1GB hitachi HDDs inside the NAS. Tested with 10/100 switch, Gigabit Switch, and Pc directly connected to NAS. Tested performances of RAID 0, RAID 1 and JBOD. Ahh almost forgot, test subject was a 2 GB single file and used Samba method Attachments:
|
|
