|
Post by N2100Owner on Jun 28, 2006 9:49:22 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by holmes4 on Jul 9, 2006 8:01:41 GMT 7
Western Digital 500GB WD5000KS-00M works fine. I have two in a RAID array.
|
|
ear1grey
New Member
GrubClub use Thecus for cost effective live backups.
Posts: 22
|
Post by ear1grey on Jul 17, 2006 23:26:35 GMT 7
I have two Samsung HD400LJ in a RAID1 configuration (381,554Mb).
They seem to be ok so far.
During formatting today (probably the hottest day of summer, indoor ambient temp 29c) they rose to 57c but have now (after resting through the firmware upgrade and some network configuration) chilled to 52c.
|
|
|
Post by bruenu on Aug 14, 2006 18:32:48 GMT 7
I have 2 Samsung SP2004C (200GB) SATA 3.0 GB/s. RAID1, 381.564 Capacity
SATA 1.5GB/s Speed Limit Jumber enabled!
Works fine with Firmware 1.05.
Don't works correct with Firmware 2.1.00, you can read my tread in the Installation Capture.
|
|
|
Post by bruenu on Aug 16, 2006 2:37:12 GMT 7
It's me again with a Correcture:
I have 2 Samsung SP2004C (200GB) SATA 3.0 GB/s. RAID1, 381.564 Capacity
SATA 1.5GB/s Speed Limit Jumber enabled! Without Speed Limit Jumper works also!
Works fine with Firmware 2.1.00
Greez Bruno
|
|
|
Post by zam1991 on Aug 22, 2006 3:38:22 GMT 7
Seagate 7200.10 320GB X2 (Mirrored) with 16mb cache per drive
Operating around 41/42 Celsius during multiple transfers.
|
|
ADK
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ADK on Aug 25, 2006 0:42:50 GMT 7
RAID 1 with:
Maxtor DiamondMax II Model: 6H400F0 400GB SATA 3.0 Gb HDD Code: HA431D90
Runs hot! System Temp: 49 HDD Temp: 50 Fan RPM: 4717 Up time: 2 days, ~ 0% CPU
|
|
|
Post by N2100Owner on Aug 28, 2006 13:58:34 GMT 7
SAMSUNG SpinPoint T series HD401LJ Capacity : 400 GB Interface : SATA 3.0 Gbps BufferMemory : 16 Mbytes
RAID0, RAID 1 -- OK
|
|
|
Post by getmythe on Oct 3, 2006 1:11:14 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by ryebank on Oct 4, 2006 19:27:07 GMT 7
Seagate ST3300622AS 300MB disks working fine in RAID1 config - prior to firmware 2.1.01 they did not sleep but they do now and it is great - coolish day now but down to 33 degC when idle
|
|
|
Post by N2100Owner on Oct 6, 2006 0:21:41 GMT 7
Drive Performance Resource Center"Active Power Dissipation" - The power consumed by a drive when at 100% seek. In the relatively closed environment of a computer case, power dissipation correlates highly with drive temperature.
|
|
|
Post by atomic on Oct 12, 2006 19:05:58 GMT 7
I know my disks are not on the list but I would like to know if anyone else is using these drives as my write speeds are terrible.. have tried RAID0,1 but still no success. 2 x Seagate ST3500630NS (Barracudas) Firmware: 3.AE Read speeds are untested as I havent copied any descent sized files over yet. EDIT: forgot to add that I have tried both 1.5Gb/s and 3Gb/s settings to no avail.
|
|
|
Post by atrix415 on Nov 3, 2006 15:41:21 GMT 7
I am using 2x 750GB Seagate. (7200.10 Series) in Raid 1
It had cut me off few times transfering last gigs of folders. (10+gigs)
P.S, It took about 4/hrs to build and format altogether.
Note: EXTREMELY HOT!!! When Touch with hands
<Case Close> System Temperature 41 / 106 (°C / °F) HDD Temperature 41 / 106 (°C / °F)
<Case Opened> System Temperature 41 / 106 (°C / °F) HDD Temperature 39 / 102 (°C / °F)
|
|
|
Post by N2100Owner on Nov 3, 2006 16:42:13 GMT 7
Found this snippet of code on the net in the sata_sil.c, which is the Silicon Image 3512 driver source code. A lot of Seagate drives are in the blacklist. It seems that these drives works with Silicon Image 3512 but at a lower speed. /* TODO firmware versions should be added - eric */ static const struct sil_drivelist { const char * product; unsigned int quirk; } sil_blacklist [] = { { "ST320012AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST330013AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST340017AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST360015AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST380013AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST380023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3120023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3160023AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3120026AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3200822AS", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST340014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST360014ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST380011ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3120022ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "ST3160021ASL", SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE }, { "Maxtor 4D060H3", SIL_QUIRK_UDMA5MAX }, { } }; ... /* limit requests to 15 sectors */ if (slow_down || ((ap->flags & SIL_FLAG_MOD15WRITE) && (quirks & SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE))) { printk(KERN_INFO "ata%u(%u): applying Seagate errata fix (mod15write workaround)\n", ap->id, dev->devno); dev->max_sectors = 15; return; }
/* limit to udma5 */ if (quirks & SIL_QUIRK_UDMA5MAX) { printk(KERN_INFO "ata%u(%u): applying Maxtor errata fix %s\n", ap->id, dev->devno, model_num); dev->udma_mask &= ATA_UDMA5; return; }
|
|
arts
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by arts on Nov 23, 2006 23:26:05 GMT 7
I was about to purchase two Seagate ST3500630AS drives for a Raid 1 configuration but I just noticed that the drive is no longer listed on the list, published on 9/29, although it was there on the list published on 9/21.
- Is anyone using this drive successfully?
I see that another user posted poor write performance with a ST3500630NS , but I'm not sure of the difference between the two.
Thanks,
|
|